CASE STUDY: NUCLEAR MEDICINE

PROVIDING THE NECESSARY GMP KNOWLEDGE

01 | The starting point

The main challenge: A lack of GMP knowledge.

When working with medical institutions, inspections by the relevant health authorities are necessary. This lead to our client encountering many problems and obstacles when clarifying situations with their customers.

The main tasks:

02 | Impact of the problem

There were several consequences of the issue discussed above:

User + regulatory requirements not met

Because our client had difficulty identifying the end customer's user requests, the equipment to be installed did not meet user requirements – or regulatory demands.

Documentation issues

The responsibilities of the parties involved in the installation and qualification process were not clearly defined. Consequently, documents were approved by the wrong people or did not exist.

End customer inspections with high number of critical findings

All of this resulted in lengthy discussions and even legal actions on the part of our client.

03 | Our solution as THE FORCE

The solution for our client here? THE FORCE provided the necessary personnel to take on the role of Quality Assurance Representative and to be involved in the project as "GMP Consultants".

It should be noted that projects like this are quite complex and involve various parties such as site planners, architects, contractors, equipment manufacturers, and utility installers.

In our assigned functions, we therefore took care of:

Preparing a Qualification Master Plan

Initially, the relevant steps for the equipment qualification process were discussed to create a Qualification Master Plan. This plan

  • clearly defines the different stages of the process,
  • identifies the equipment, areas, and systems involved in the qualification,
  • assigns responsibilities.

Creating comparability matrices for compliance

Following this, we developed comparability matrices for compliance for each piece of equipment that had been identified as relevant to qualification. A discussion process was initiated with the various suppliers to enable them to respond accurately to user requirements.

Reviewing qualification documents

We wanted to ensure that user requirements and identified risks were appropriately addressed prior to approval by the end customer. In order to achieve this, we carefully reviewed the qualification documents.

04 | Results

Design Qualification (DQ) processes for most equipment successfully completed

The processes demonstrated compliance with requirements and showed few to no deviations.

Modifications to initial planning implemented to ensure continued compliance

The implementation was in line with updated European Union regulations, including Annex 1 of the EU GMP.

Project documentation managed efficiently & in accordance with Good Documentation Practices

05 | Strategies for continued success

  • A single project turned into 4

    The strategy and support we provided to our client were well received: What began as a single project has transformed into 4 concurrent projects across 3 different countries. These projects remain ongoing, with regular meetings held among all stakeholders. Several qualification phases have already been completed successfully from a quality perspective.
  • Ongoing support + communication

    Support for our client and communication with the project managers and the commercial team will continue until all projects are finalised.
  • Continuously building a sound relationship

    Our client highly values clear communication, responsiveness in handling ad hoc tasks, and on-site visits to the end customers. This has helped and continues to foster trust as well as strengthen the working relationship.

Get in touch now!

Contact us to find out how your project can benefit from our services, as well.